Filed under: M.E.
«Jeg har stor tro på prof De Meirleirs måte å arbeide på. Jeg har fulgt ham på nært hold nå i over ett år og er imponert over hans måte å tilnærme seg ME på. Han er kanskje den som står nærmest for øyeblikket til å løse ME «gåten».» Professor i medisin, Ola Didrik Saugstad (kilde).
Velkommen! Her følger noen få tips til deg som besøker bloggen:
Husk å besøk forumet: www.ME-behandling.com
Hvis det er noen som har erfaringer (gode eller dårlige) med behandlingen til KDM og vil dele disse med oss på denne bloggen, så setter vi kjempestor pris på det. Jeg har ikke funnet noen «solskinnshistorier» (eller negative historier for den saks skyld) på Internett som omhandler behandlingen til KDM. For de fleste er det forbundet store utgifter med å reise til Belgia og la seg undersøke, og det er forståelig at man ønsker noen forsikringer eller tilbakemeldinger fra noen, slik a man vet at behandlingen fungerer. Trykk på linken som heter KOMMENTARER under i denne boksen og skrive inn din beskjed (jeg samler alle tilbakemeldinger på en side etter hvert).
For de som lurer på om KDM sin behandling fungerer vil jeg anbefale å lese «Måne» og «Minerva» sine kommentarer under Hvordan få tak i medisin? den 3. november, samt «Sun» sitt innlegg den 4. nobember; I deg fekk eg brev frå the professor🙂.>> Har du mulighet, er det fint om du svarer på denne «spørreundersøkelsen». <<
De siste blogginnleggene finner du fortløpende under.
Alle nye og tidligere innlegg er sortert i kategorier, velg forskjellige kategorier under sidemenyen KATEGORIER til venstre.
På alle innleggene er det mulig å legge inn kommentarer. Trykk på linken X KOMMENTARER for å lese eller legge igjen kommentarer. Du trenger ikke skrive inn e-postadressen din eller ditt ordentlige navn hvis du ønsker å kommentere innleggene.
De siste kommentarene på innlegg her på bloggen finnes under sidemenyen SISTE KOMMENTARER til venstre.
Lenker til sider vi tror kan være av interesse ligger under sidemenyen LENKER til venstre.
Mer info om bakgrunnen til bloggen finner du under sidemenyen SIDER og ‘Om DrStockmann’ til venstre.
Ønsker du å komme i kontakt med Sun eller meg kan du trykk på linken som heter KOMMENTARER under i denne boksen og skrive inn din beskjed (NB! den vil være synlig for alle som besøker denne bloggen).
Her i Norge er det veldig lang ventetid +mange slitsomme undersøkelser for å finne ut om en har ME.
Og viss vi får ME-diagnose,er det ingen behandling å få ” her på berget”.
Det einaste ”tilbudet” vi får er aktivitetsavpasning/ energiøkonomisering+ å tenke positivt.
Eg har hatt ME i over 11 år, og har overlevt slik, men en blir ikkje frisk att av det…
Som de veit, så har både ”drstockmann”og eg vore i Belgia hos Professor dr.med. Kenny De Meirleir.
Det viste seg å vere veldig lurt!! Med hans store erfaring med diagnostisering og behandling av ME-pasientar, merka vi at vi var i trygge hender. Han er interressert i å finne ut kva kroppen slit med:
– Ved å studere det to siders spørjeskjemaet vi fylde ut på venteværelset
-Ved å spørje tilleggsspørsmål.
-Ved å lytte til sjukehistoria til kvar enkelt pasient.
(Lurt å skrive den ned på engelsk el fransk og gi den til sekretæren hans før du skal inn til han)
-Så bestemmer han seg for kva slags testar du treng å ta
Det er ikkje berre til Redlabs (www.redlabs.com) han sender testar, mine blei sende til 7 forskjellige laboratorium, nokre til USA.
Dette kostar ein del (sjå annan plass på Bloggen).
-Men du får svar på utredninga di innan 5 veker
-Då kan du avtale telefontime med ”The Professor” eller få ny time hos han i Brussel om du vil.
Det kan du vurdere underveis.
-Han kjem med spesialistforslag om behandling .(Du bestemmer sjølv om du vil ha behandling)
-Hvis noko kan gjerast, har du komt til rett ME-spesialist!
-Han finn omtrent alltid noko han kan gripe fatt i så du kan bli betre /heilt frisk!
-Det er ca 1 mnd ventetid hos KDM.
=På litt over to mnd kan du få vite kva som er problemet for kroppen din, og evt få begynne på ei behandling som hjelper kroppen din ut av ”ME-tilstanden”!
Kor lang tid tek slikt i Norge??
Skal du vente til legane her finn ut korleis ein skal behandle ME/CFS?
Det einaste du risikerer er å bli FRISK!
«Det beste ein kan bruke pengane sine på er helsa», seier mannen min:-)
Eg og mine er VELDIG GLAD for at eg satsa på KDM og fekk hjelp!!
Tenk kor mykje tid og pengar eg hadde spart viss eg hadde oppdaga han før!!
Men betre seint enn aldri!
Filed under: 1
Filed under: Diverse, KDM, M.E.-behandling i Belgia, M.E.-lenker, Om undersøkelsene og behandlingen
Eg fekk denne forskningsartikkelen frå Prof. Dr. med. Kenny De Meirleir.
Her er hans kommentar:
This article shows that there is GUT INFLAMMATION.
My view :
. when the microorganisms in the gut are ordinary —> use of pre- and probiotics.
. when there are pathogenic micro-organisms antibiotics (short course should be used)
. when an ME patient has other infections (outside gut) they should also be treated.
Gut Inflammation in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Shaheen E Lakhan; Annette Kirchgessner
Posted: 12/02/2010; Nutr Metab. 2010;7(1) © 2010 BioMed Central, Ltd.
Abstract and Introduction
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a debilitating disease characterized by unexplained disabling fatigue and a combination of accompanying symptoms the pathology of which is incompletely understood. Many CFS patients complain of gut dysfunction. In fact, patients with CFS are more likely to report a previous diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a common functional disorder of the gut, and experience IBS-related symptoms. Recently, evidence for interactions between the intestinal microbiota, mucosal barrier function, and the immune system have been shown to play a role in the disorder’s pathogenesis.
Studies examining the microecology of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract have identified specific microorganisms whose presence appears related to disease; in CFS, a role for altered intestinal microbiota in the pathogenesis of the disease has recently been suggested. Mucosal barrier dysfunction promoting bacterial translocation has also been observed. Finally, an altered mucosal immune system has been associated with the disease. In this article, we discuss the interplay between these factors in CFS and how they could play a significant role in GI dysfunction by modulating the activity of the enteric nervous system, the intrinsic innervation of the gut.
If an altered intestinal microbiota, mucosal barrier dysfunction, and aberrant intestinal immunity contribute to the pathogenesis of CFS, therapeutic efforts to modify gut microbiota could be a means to modulate the development and/or progression of this disorder. For example, the administration of probiotics could alter the gut microbiota, improve mucosal barrier function, decrease pro-inflammatory cytokines, and have the potential to positively influence mood in patients where both emotional symptoms and inflammatory immune signals are elevated. Probiotics also have the potential to improve gut motility, which is dysfunctional in many CFS patients.
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a clinical condition characterized by persistent and unexplained relapsing fatigue that is worsened by physical and mental exertion.[1,2] According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) report, the overall prevalence of CFS in the USA is as many as 4 million people.[3,4] Up to 80% of those affected are women.
These individuals suffer from severe fatigue that impairs daily activity, diminishes quality of life (QOL) for years, and has no known cure. CFS represents an economic burden for society and healthcare institutions.
The CDC originally proposed the term CFS in 1988. In 1994, the International CFS Study Group published a revised and more inclusive case definition which defines CFS on the fulfillment of two major criteria: chronic fatigue of at least 6 months duration, which is accompanied by various rheumatologic, infectious and neuropsychiatric symptoms.
Although considerable progress has been made in recent years, a major gap in the knowledge of the pathogenesis of CFS remains and has precluded the discovery of effective forms of treatment. Moreover, the diagnosis of CFS is highly problematic since no biological markers specific to this disease have been identified. Thus, CFS is a diagnosis of exclusion.
Along with disabling fatigue, CFS is characterized by neuropsychological disturbances such as headaches, myalgia, arthralgia, and post-exertional malaise; cognitive difficulties, with impaired memory and concentration; un-refreshing sleep; and mood changes, such as depression and anxiety. In addition, many CFS patients complain of gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances, including abdominal pain or discomfort and an alteration in bowel habit. In fact,patients with CFS are more likely to report a previous diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a common functional disorder of the gastrointestinal tract, and experience IBS-related symptoms. Although the precise pathophysiology of CFS is yet to be fully elucidated, the high frequency of co-morbidities in CFS suggests that the
underlying pathophysiological mechanisms cannot be confined to an organ (e.g., the brain), but rather must involve an integrating system or mechanism such as the brain-gut axis and the autonomic nervous system.
There is a growing body of literature describing immune dysfunction in CFS. A possible involvement of the immune system is supported by the observation that the onset of CFS is often preceded by virus infections and a «flu-like» illness. For example, infectious mononucleosis has been shown to be a risk factor for developing CFS. Immune activation is also suggested by an elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, an increased expression of T lymphocyte activation markers, such as CD26 and CD38 and decreased function of natural killer (NK) cells (for review see ).
Both physical and psychological stressors have been found to activate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, an important link between the brain and the immune system. Corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) produced in the hypothalamus, is the primary hypothalamic regulatory peptide of the HPA axis and its release has been shown tobe controlled by circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines, especially interleukin (IL)-6. Thus, the increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines seen in CFS patients may be involved in an exaggerated activation of the HPA axis. The frequent association between CFS and IBS could also be governed by elevated circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines acting either locally or on the brain-gut axis. Patients with IBS were shown to have increased plasma levels of IL-6 and IL-8. Moreover, patients with both IBS and CFS were found to have, in addition, increased levels of two other pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL-1β and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. Given that other studies have shown a variety of findings (mast cell activation, increased lymphocytes) suggesting a state of low-grade inflammation or immune activation in the mucosa and lamina propria of the bowel, increased serum concentrations of cytokines have been interpreted as evidence of spill-over from a primary focus in the gut. Thus, pro-inflammatory cytokines may be involved in the exaggerated activation of the HPA axis and thereby promote a coordinated central response to stress, such as GI inflammation and dysfunction.
There is now evidence that CFS is associated with marked alterations in the gut microbiota, with lower levels of Bifidobacteria and higher levels of aerobic bacteria. Gut pathogens can communicate with the CNS and influence emotional behaviors such as anxiety and depression, even at extremely low levels and in the absence of an immune response.[19,20] In addition, probiotics or live microorganisms which confer a health benefit on the host, have the potential to decrease mood-regulating systemic pro-inflammatory cytokines, decrease oxidative stress and improve nutritional status when orally consumed (see below). Probiotic lactic acid producing-bacteria have been shown to prevent and alleviate GI disturbances and to normalize the cytokine profile which might be of an advantage for patients suffering from CFS.
In the case of CFS, evidence for a synergism between aberrant gut microbiota, mucosal barrier dysfunction, and altered mucosal immunity contributing to the disorder’s pathogenesis has begun to evolve. Research shows that patients with CFS have alterations in gut microbiota. Moreover, emerging studies have demonstrated that pathogenic and non-pathogenic gut microbiota may influence mood-related symptoms and even behavior in animals and humans. These findings lend further support to the presence of a gut-brain interface, one that may be modulated by gut microbiota.
Experimental data also show that inflammation, even if mild, can lead to persistent changes in GI nerve and smooth muscle function, resulting in dysmotility, hypersensitivity, and dysfunction. Furthermore, alterations in gut function are observed after the resolution of an acute intestinal inflammation.[23,24] The enteric nervous system (ENS), the intrinsic innervation of the bowel, controls virtually all GI functions (e.g., motility, secretion, blood flow, mucosal growth and aspects of the local immune system). Whether the persistent alterations in gut function observed in the majority of CFS patients are due to inflammation-related changes in the properties of enteric nerves is unknown.
This review will provide a brief overview of the current understanding of the role of gut inflammation in CFS. Despite advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of CFS, therapeutic options for combating the symptoms of CFS are still not available.
Early conceptualizations of CFS focused on the role of viral infection. This is not surprising since in 60 to 80% of published reports, CFS presents with acute onset of illness, with systemic symptoms similar to influenza infection that do not subside. Numerous researchers have tried to correlate infection by several microorganisms with the onset of CFS. For example, the human parvovirus (HPV)-B19 has been the most reported CFS-associated virus. Although several studies have detected parvovirus B19 DNA in the GI tract of CFS patients, it is not consistently detected in all patients. Another difficulty is associating the onset of CFS with the presence of antibodies to HPV-B19.
Other studies have suggested that infection by another virus, the human herpes virus-6 (HHV-6), a neurotropic, gliotropic, and immunotropic virus, is more often found in patients with CFS than in healthy controls. However, using real-time PCR, high loads of HHV-6 DNA were detected in most CFS and control biopsies. Other studies attempted to show an association between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and postinfectious onset of CFS. EBV infection has been shown to cause extreme fatigue during the acute illness and to be a risk factor for developing CFS, with a prevalence rate of 8% observed at 6 months.[11,28] However, EBV was found in 15-30% of all biopsies.
Thus, the involvement of EBV in addition to various enteroviruses, and the human T-lymphotropic virus type 2 (HTLV-2) has not been conclusively proven.
In October 2009, Lomardi et al. reported finding a gammaretrovirus in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)
DNA from about 67% of CFS patients compared to only 3.6% of healthy persons using PCR testing. The agent was named xenotropic MLV-related virus (XMRV) because its env gene was nearly identical to that of xenotropic MLV, an infectious endogenous MLV that preferentially infects cells from foreign species, including humans. Almost half of the CFS patients in this study described the onset of their symptoms as related to an acute viral disease. In addition, virus isolation and antibody detection were reported in some CFS patients.
Confirmation of an association and etiologic role of XMRV in CFS is important because it could provide a useful diagnostic test and might lead to new treatment interventions. Inhibitors of XMRV such as the integrase inhibitor raltegravir, are now available. However, two recent studies from the United Kingdom using PCR testing alone or together with serologic testing reported negative XMRV results in CFS patients.[31,32] XMRV was also not found by PCR testing in CFS patients from the Netherlands, China, or the United States, questioning the association of XMRV with CFS.
Although confidence in the link between infection and CFS pathogenesis has waned, recent studies have suggested that infection with gut pathogens could be related to CFS onset.
Raised serum concentrations of IgA and IgM to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of gram-negative enterobacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Morganella morganii, Proteus mirabilis, Pseduomonas putida, Citrobacter koseri, and Klebsiella pneumoniae have been reported in CFS patients. The prevalence and median values for serum IgA against the LPS of enterobacteria were significantly greater in patients with CFS than in normal volunteers and patients with partial CFS. Moreover, serum IgA levels were significantly correlated to the severity of illness, as measured by the FibroFatigue scale. The FibroFatigue scale is an observer’s rating scale with 12 items measuring pain, muscular tension, fatigue, concentration difficulties, failing memory, irritability, sadness, sleep disturbances, and autonomic disturbances and irritable bowel, headache, and subjective experience of infection. It is a reliable and valid measuring instrument that is used to monitor symptom severity and change during treatment of CFS patients.
Normally, the intestinal epithelium acts as a continuous barrier to avoid LPS translocation; however, some endogenous or exogenous events may alter this protective function. This may induce an increased bacterial translocation and thus increased serum endotoxin concentrations which, in turn may trigger an immune response.
Thus, the increased serum IgA and IgM levels against LPS in CFS indicate the presence of increased gut permeability and an immune response mounted against LPS of the enterobacteria.
The human GI tract contains a complex and delicately balanced ecosystem of more than 17 bacterial families encompassing 400 to 500 different microbial species. The main genera of these commensal bacteria are:
Lactobacillus, Bifidobacteria, Bacteroides, Clostridia, Fusobacteria, Eubacteria, Peptococcus, Streptococcus, Escherichia and Veillonella. They regulate a myriad of host processes and provide several nutrients to their host and their symbionts within the microbial community. In healthy individuals, these relationships are thought to occur in equilibrium; however, the normal balance of gut microbiota can be altered by a number of factors and this is turn can contribute to certain functional disorders. For example, the number of different commensal bacteria is altered in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD patients have increased bacteroides, adherent or invasive Escherichia coli, and enterococci, and reduced Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus species.
The composition of the gut microbiota can be altered by various factors including stress. Psychological stress alters the gut microbiota towards decreased numbers of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli. Bifidobacteria are a group of bacteria that have been shown to reduce intestinal LPS levels and LPS-induced activation of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) in mice. Inhibition of LPS-induced NF-κB activation was accompanied by a dose-dependent decrease of pro-inflammatory cytokines and cyclooxygenase 2. Stress in neonatal Rhesus monkeys was reported to suppress the numbers of Lactobacilli in the fecal flora in association with increased susceptibility for opportunistic infections.
Restraint conditions, acoustic stress and food deprivation have all been shown to negatively alter gut microbiota in various animal studies.[44,45] Interestingly, stress (e.g., psychological, physical exhaustion) is a well-established trigger factor for CFS.
Investigations have documented that there are marked alterations in the gut microbiota of CFS patients, with lower levels of Bifidobacteria and higher levels of aerobic bacteria. Dr. Henry Butt and colleagues from the University of Newcastle, Australia have been examining the intestinal microbiota of CFS patients for a number of years. In 1998, they presented the first evidence of altered fecal microbiota in CFS patients compared to normal, healthy controls.
The mean distribution of the Gram negative Escherichia coli as a percentage of the total aerobic flora of control subjects was 92.3% compared to 49% in CFS patients. Among aerobes, the D-lactic acid producing Enterococcus and Streptococcus species were strongly over-represented in CFS patients. These findings were recently confirmed. Among anaerobic bacteria, Prevotella was the most commonly overgrown bacteria. Moreover, it was shown that the higher the aerobic enterococcal count, the more severe the neurological and cognitive deficits including nervousness, memory loss, forgetfulness and confusion. Consequently, high plasma LPS levels in CFS could result from an increased production of endotoxin upon changes in the gut microbiota.
Mucosal Barrier Function
To protect itself from uncontrolled inflammatory responses, the intestinal epithelium has developed mechanisms to restrain bacterial growth, limit direct contact with the bacteria, and prevent bacterial dissemination into underlying tissue. The mucosal barrier, which consists of only a single layer of epithelial cells, is one of the most important components of the innate immune system, and all that separates the inside of the body from a very «dirty» outside environment. Thus, mucosal barrier function is a key component in the arsenal of defense mechanisms required to prevent infection and inflammation. Mucosal barrier function is maintained by several interrelated systems, including mucous secretion, chloride and water secretion, and binding together of epithelial cells at their apical junctions by tight junction proteins. Together, they act as the «gatekeeper» of the mucosal barrier.
Disruption of mucosal barrier function occurs in CFS as demonstrated by the increased serum concentrations of IgA and IgM to LPS of gram-negative enterobacteria. Psychological stress disrupts the mucosal barrier allowing increased entry of antigens and microorganisms, which in turn is expected to stimulate hyperactive responses in the mucosal immune system. For example, chronic water avoidance stress in rats induces increases in the adherence of bacteria to intestinal epithelial cells, bacterial internalization into enterocytes and the appearance of bacteria in the lamina propria. Consequently, mucosal barrier dysfunction causes alterations in gut motility, abnormal secretion, and changes in visceral sensation that could contribute to symptom generation. This may at least partially explain the link between stress and CFS. The relationship between IBS and CFS may also reflect in part disorders in gut permeability as altered gut microbiota (e.g., higher numbers of Veillonella and Lactobacillus than healthy controls) and a disrupted mucosal barrier are found in patients with IBS.[49,50] Furthermore, IBS patients with high acetic acid or propionic acid levels presented more severe symptoms, impaired quality of life and negative emotions. Butt and colleagues reported that fatigue presentation in CFS patients with symptoms of IBS was more severe than in CFS patients without irritable bowel. Furthermore, patients with both CFS and IBS had poorer appetite, increased abdominal pain, increased severity of loose stools, diarrhea, nausea, and gastric reflux. The gut microbiota influences the sensory, motor and immune system of the gut and interacts with higher brain centers even at extremely low levels. So aberrant gut microbiota and gut barrier dysfunction may actually be creating an «irritable» bowel. Altered intestinal microbiota and gut barrier dysfunction could also contribute to the symptoms of CFS through increased translocation of LPS from gram-negative enterobacteria.
Therapeutic Restoration of Mucosal Barrier Function
Since altered intestinal microbiota and gut barrier dysfunction barrier are found in CFS, they offer potential targets for intervention that would include modulation of the gut microbiota to correct an imbalance, as well as tightening of interepithelial junctions. Enhancement of barrier function by probiotic bacteria has been observed in both in vitro models and in vivo animal models.
Probiotics are live microorganisms with a vast array of therapeutic potential for GI disease. They have a beneficial effect on the intestinal mucosa via several proposed mechanisms that include inhibition of the mucosal adhesion of pathogens, improvement of the barrier function of the epithelium, and alteration of the immune activity of the host.
They may also regulate intraluminal fermentation and stabilize the gut microbiota. In addition, probiotics have recently emerged as promising adjunctive therapy in treating IBS, with B. infantis becoming the frontrunner for treatment (for review see ).
Probiotic bacteria are Lactobacilli spp., certain types of Streptococcus, and Bifidobacteria spp., but also other non-pathogenic bacilli such as E. coli-Nisle 1917 and yeasts such as Saccharamyces boulardii. They secrete short chain fatty acids, an action that results in decreased luminal pH and production of bactericidal proteins. Butyric acid, a byproduct of bacterial fermentation of fiber, has been shown to nourish colonic enterocytes, enhancing mucosal integrity. In addition, probiotics may improve bowel dysmotility.
Researchers have demonstrated the utility of probiotics for mood regulation in CFS patients. Administration of Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota (LcS; 24 billion cfu/day) to adult patients meeting the formal diagnostic criteria for CFS, was found at eight weeks to cause a significant rise in both Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria in those taking the LcS and there was also a significant decrease in anxiety symptoms. The elevation of Bifidobacteria levels should be considered a positive finding, particularly when considering that Bifidobacteria levels may be low in CFS.
Bifidobacteria appear to play an important role in maintaining the gut barrier. An increase in Bifidobacteria in ob/ob mice was associated with a significant improvement of gut permeability measured in vivo; this improvement was linked to an increase in tight junction mRNA expression and protein distribution. In addition, the rise in Bifidobacteria was correlated with a decrease in plasma LPS concentrations; therefore, a significant reduction inmarkers of oxidative and inflammatory stress.
Bifidobacterium infantis can boost serotonin levels in areas of the brain associated with anxiety and depression. Improvements in anxiety scores among those CFS patients consuming LcS bacteria are especially noteworthy.
The idea that implanting the gut with Lactobacillus strains may improve quality of life and mental health is not a new one. Dr. George Porter Phillips first reported in 1910 that although Lactobacillus tablets and powder were ineffective, a gelatin-whey formula with live lactic acid-producing bacteria improved depressive symptoms in adults with melancholia. Overall, probiotics will likely have an emerging therapeutic role in treating CFS.
Cytokines and Inflammation CFS is typically characterized by a chronic, low-grade inflammation. Although fatigue severity appears to correlate with inflammatory disease activity and is therefore consistent with an immunological model of CFS, it is not known
whether inflammation causes fatigue. Results from a population-based study indicate that people with CFS had increased markers of peripheral inflammation when compared to healthy controls, but had a similar inflammatory profile when compared to unhealthy subjects who did not meet the criteria for CFS.
It is unlikely that CFS «causes» increased inflammation. Rather people with fatiguing conditions are likely to exhibit «unwellness» symptoms for a variety of reasons. One such reason may be an increase in peripheral pro-inflammatory signaling based on overwhelming evidence that pro-inflammatory cytokines are capable of inducing all the cardinal symptoms of CFS in humans.[57,58] Thus, factors that increase inflammation, such as stress and depression can increase peripheral inflammation, significantly increasing the risk in individuals with CFS of subsequently developing vascular disease, metabolic disease and dementia.
Several groups have reported evidence of chronic immune dysfunction in CFS although the exact nature of this dysfunction remains unclear. While initial studies generally suggested immunosuppression, recent years have seen increased interest in the possibility that activation of the innate immune response might contribute to symptom development in CFS.[59,60] Studies have reported increased plasma concentration of the acute phase reactant c-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with CFS. Other findings include higher frequencies of various autoantibodies. A significant increase in the numbers of B cells with CD20+ CD5+ phenotype which is correlated with autoantibody production and with CD21 markers that is a ligand for retroviruses was also found in patients with CFS.
CFS has a propensity to over-produce pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α coupled with a decreased production of anti-inflammatory cytokines. A principal avenue of investigation has been the measurement in blood of immune signals conducted by cytokines. In animal studies, administration of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, TNF-α, and IL-6) directly into the brain can induce «sickness behaviors» that strongly resemble the symptoms of CFS. In particular, decreased motor activity, altered food and water intake, sleep and cognition have been linked to increases in the levels of IL-1b, IL-6 and TNF-α. Furthermore, in humans, systemically administered pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6 and TNF-α typically induce a systemic inflammatory response where one of the major symptoms is intense fatigue.
The sensation of fatigue or exhaustion is prevalent in a number of infectious and chronic inflammatory disease states including IBD, systemic lupus erythematosus and ankylosing spondylitis. In rheumatoid arthritis and IBD, in which TNF-α plays an integral role, fatigue is markedly improved by treatment with anti-TNF-α agents. Thus, amelioration of fatigue is mediated through an anti-inflammatory effect showing that the CNS is extremely susceptible to immunological reactions that occur during disease and injury.
The TNF-α inhibitors are a group of drugs that may provide benefit in CFS. One TNF-α inhibitor, etanercept, has been used with considerable benefit in the treatment of six patients with CFS in a pilot study. Unfortunately, this trial was not published as a paper but only as a meeting abstract. The use of TNF-a inhibitors in CFS is strongly supported by data on the immune responses in CFS, and data from gene expression studies.[64,65] Thus, it is important to repeat this work and carry out a larger clinical trial of etanercept in patients with CFS.
On the basis of the results of gene expression studies, a clinical trial of IFN-β was proposed in CFS patients. IFN-β is associated with the regulation of humoral immune responses and immune responses against viral infections. IFN-β stimulates the activity of NK cells, which are considered to be inefficient in patients with CFS. It selectively inhibits the expression of some mitochondrial genes that are implicated by gene studies in patients with CFS. Finally, IFN-β is a licensed treatment for multiple sclerosis, helping in reduction of fatigue. The pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis is also thought to be cytokine mediated, as has been shown in CFS.
Broderick et al. recently demonstrated that CFS is associated with a profound imbalance in the regulation of immune function. In this study, instead of analyzing immunological markers individually, network analysis was applied to study the co-expression of 16 cytokines in CFS subjects and healthy controls. Analysis showed consistent and significantly attenuated patterns of Th1 and Th17 immune responses in CFS in the context of a well-established Th2 inflammatory milieu. These patterns would have escaped detection had the analysis focused solely on differential expression of individual cytokines.
Interestingly, the cytokine co-expression patterns described in this study, were consistent with the disruptive effects of latent viral infection by pathogens such as EBV. Viral triggers such as EBV have long been suspected of involvement in the onset and persistence of CFS. However, this virus is not consistently detected in all patients. While other causes may underlie the cytokine expression pattern observed in CFS patients many of these are at least consistent with some of the disruptive effects of chronic viral infection.
Effects of Inflammation on the Gut
Patients with CFS manifest symptoms suggestive of disturbed gut function, such as abdominal pain, diarrhea and/or constipation. Under both physiological and pathological conditions, the ENS, the intrinsic innervation of the bowel, regulates intestinal mucosal function and coordinates the activity of the GI tract. The ENS is a component of the autonomic nervous system with the unique ability to function independently from the CNS (for review, see ).
Enteric ganglia are organized into two major ganglionated plexuses, namely the myenteric (Auerbach’s) and submucosal (Meissner’s) plexus, and contain a variety of functionally distinct neurons, including primary afferent neurons, interneurons, and motor neurons, synaptically linked to each other in microcircuits.
While the myenteric plexus mainly regulates intestinal motility, the submucosal plexus together with nerve fibers in the lamina propria are involved in regulating epithelial transport. These nerves form networks within the lamina propria of both crypts and villi with the terminal axons in close contact with the basal lamina, an ideal position not only to affect epithelial cell functions but also to detect absorbed nutrients and antigens. These substances or released mediators from epithelial cells may act on the nerve terminals to change the properties of enteric neurons and cause peripheral sensitization. Consequently, permanent or even transient structural alterations in the ENS disrupt normal GI function.
Since the ENS controls the motility and secretion of the bowel these abnormalities indicate the impact of inflammation on neural signaling in the ENS.
Several studies have demonstrated ENS structural changes associated with gut inflammation. For example, damage to axons has been observed in the inflamed human intestine in episodes of IBD.[68–70] Other changes that occur in the ENS during inflammation include altered neurotransmitter synthesis, content, and release, changes in glial cell numbers and a myenteric ganglionitis associated with infiltrates of lymphocytes, plasma cells and mast cells.[71,72] In fact, consequences of intestinal inflammation, even if mild, persist for weeks beyond the point at which detectable inflammation has subsided (for review see ). Thus, persistent changes in GI nerve function, resulting in dysmotility, pain, and gut dysfunction long after the resolution of the initiating inflammatory event could contribute to GI disorders observed in CFS.
It is well known that CFS is accompanied by increased oxidative stress. People with chronic conditions, such as CFS have lower levels of L-glutathione. Research has shown that L-glutathione levels in cells can be dramatically depleted by excessive oxidative stress. In turn, L-glutathione deficiency has been shown to contribute to oxidative stress and disease, resulting in a vicious cycle.
Oxidative stress arises when there is a marked imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and their removal by antioxidants. In reaction to mild oxidative stress, tissues often respond by producing more antioxidants; however, severe persistent oxidative stress depletes body antioxidant resources and overtakes its ability to produce more antioxidants, leading to lower antioxidant levels and as well as injury in the tissues. 8-OH-deoxy guanosine (8-OHdG) is a commonly used and highly sensitive marker of total oxidative stress in the body. Upon DNA repair, 8-OHdG is excreted in the urine. Numerous studies have indicated that urinary 8-OHdG is not only a biomarker of generalized cellular oxidative stress, but also a risk factor for many diseases including CFS.
Elevated urinary 8-OHdG DNA was detected in patients with CFS. Moreover, the level of urinary 8-OHdG in CFS correlated with the severity of depression and malaise. Thus, increased activation of oxidative and nitrosative (IO and NS) pathways, plays a role in CFS. Moreover, measuring urinary 8-OHdG may be a convenient method for evaluating oxidative DNA damage in patients with CFS and could be a sensitive biomarker helpful for the early diagnosis of patients with CFS.
Maes proposed that IO and NS pathways play a key role in the pathophysiology of CFS. Increased plasma concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines, oxidative damage, increased COX-2 production, and increased translocation by gram-negative enterobacteria can generate CFS-like symptoms including fatigue, a flu-like malaise, pain, symptoms of IBS, and neurocognitive disorders. In addition, aberrations in IO and NS pathways are interrelated.
For example, viral and bacterial infections and gut-derived inflammation may induce NF-κB and consequently COX-2, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. These inflammatory pathways and persistent or reactivating infections induce ROS and radical nitrogen species (RNS), which in turn may damage membrane fatty acids, proteins, DNA and mitochondria. As a consequence, some cellular immune functions may be suppressed, for example, lowered NK cell activity and ex vivo expression of T cell activation markers, such as CD69. Depletion of antioxidants in patients with CFS, partially due to inflammation, may further impair the protection again ROS and RNS, causing more damage to fatty acids, proteins, DNA and mitochondria.
Alterations of the gut microbiota may have serious consequences for the host health. Overgrown pathogenic bacteria found in the oral cavity and GI tract produce the «toxic gas» hydrogen sulfide (H2S) when they come in contact with heavy metals. H2S, a colorless, flammable and water-soluble gas with the characteristic odor of rotten eggs, has been known for decades because of its toxicity and as an environmental hazard. Inhibition of mitochondrial respiration, more potent than that of cyanide, resulting from blockade of cytochrome c oxidase is the main mechanism of H2S toxicity.
H2S is normally found in the body, which suggests that this molecule could have physiologic relevance. The mucosa of the gut is continuously exposed to H2S generated by sulfate-reducing bacteria. However, too much H2S, produced by the overgrowth of harmful, pathogenic bacteria as occurs during inflammation causes the intestinal epithelial barrier to break down. Increased levels of bacterial H2S stimulate the production of destructive compounds called ROS, which inhibit mitochondrial function directly. An increase in ROS caused by an imbalance between antioxidant defenses and ROS production results in tissue damage and, eventually, cell death. This is a key mechanism for the development of gut infections. Thus, there is evidence that H2S is involved in chronic (long-term) inflammation of the gut. People with CFS were shown to have higher concentrations of intestinal bacteria than normal, which probably leads to higher levels of H2S. Professor Kenny De Meirleir of the Brussels Free University and his team say high levels of H2S caused by an intestinal overgrowth of Gram positive D/L lactate-producing bacteria play a major role in CFS and lead to a series of reactions in your body that leave cells devoid of oxygen and energy. Understanding the role of the intestinal barrier and its breakdown is an area of research that is currently receiving a great deal of attention as is considered by many scientists as the real basis for CFS. Interestingly, it has recently been shown that H2S is also present in gut nerves in humans and guinea pigs. Schemann and colleagues found that more than 90% of neurons in the ENS contain enzymes that produce H2S. In addition, H2S increased neuronal electrical activity and significantly increased mucosal secretion. These finding suggest H2S is a novel gut-signaling molecule and may be the third gaseous transmitter in addition to nitric oxide and carbon monoxide.
Mitochondrial Failure and CFS
Dr. Sarah Myhill and colleagues have proposed that CFS is linked to «mitochondria failure». Mitochondria use fuel molecules derived from food to produce energy by oxidative metabolism in the form of adenosine triphosphate or ATP, which when hydrolysed to the disphosphate, ADP, releases energy to produce muscle contractions, nerve impulses and all the energy-consuming processes needed to synthesize all of the complex molecules of the body. ATP recycles approximately every 10 seconds in a healthy individual. However, when mitochondria are impaired the energy they supply will be impaired and so the individually has poor stamina, as in CFS. Also, when a cell is filled with defective mitochondria, it not only becomes deprived of energy (ATP). It can accumulate a backlog of unused fuel molecules (glucose) and oxygen with disastrous effects. If the body is short of ATP, it can make a very small amount directly from glucose by converting it into lactic acid. This is exactly what many individuals with CFS do. They readily switch into anaerobic metabolism. However, this results in serious problems.
The buildup of lactic acid in the blood, called lactic acidosis is associated with muscle pain, heaviness, aching and soreness («lactic acid burn»), and might actually damage muscle and nerve tissue. People suffering from CFS have difficulty increasing their fitness. Their response to incremental exercise is increased oxidative stress with marked alterations of muscle membrane excitability. Thus, mitochondrial dysfunction results in fatigue and could produce symptoms of CFS.
There is considerable evidence that mitochondrial dysfunction is present in some CFS patients. Muscle biopsies have shown abnormal mitochondrial degeneration in CFS patients. Mitochondrial dysfunction occurs in neutrophils in CFS patients. Neutrophils are the major effector cells of the immune system and the observed mitochondrial dysfunction is bound to have a deleterious effect on this system. Moreover, the degree of dysfunction was strongly correlated with the severity of their illness suggesting that the severity of a person’s CFS relates to the severity of the mitochondrial dysfunction.
Deficiency of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) has been found in some CFS patients. CoQ10 is a mitochondrial nutrient, which acts as an essential cofactor for the production of ATP and displays significant antioxidant activities and anti-inflammatory effects.
In a study conducted by Maes and colleagues, more than 40% of patients with CFS had values below the lowest CoQ10 value detected in normal, healthy controls (490 microg/L). Moreover, CFS patients with very low plasma CoQ10 (< 390 microg/L) suffered significantly more from concentration and memory disturbances. Deficiency of CoQ10 is also found in fibromyalgia, depression and a risk factor for atherosclerosis. The presence of CoQ10 deficiency may also explain the accompanying depression seen in CFS and increased morbidity due to chronic heart failure in CFS patients. These results suggest that people with CFS might benefit from CoQ10 supplementation in order to normalize the low CoQ10 syndrome.
CoQ10 supplementation also appears to have a beneficial effect on gut dysfunction observed in animal models of colitis. Over 12 weeks, the mice experienced a recovery in loose stools and bleeding in the GI tract. Since CoQ10 acts as an antioxidant, it may help lessen the inflammation by reducing tissue damage caused by gut pathogens.
Future studies are required to determine whether oral CoQ10 is beneficial in the prevention and/or treatment of symptoms associated with CFS.
Clearly, much work remains in terms of understanding the role of gut inflammation in CFS development. Despite several studies showing health benefits of probiotics, the enthusiasm for their application as well as other means to alter the intestinal microbial ecosystem in the prevention of CFS needs to be tempered due to the current lack of knowledge of the normal gut microbiota, in addition to questions as to how it affects the immune system. Future studies using newly developed techniques to evaluate the gut microbiota in CFS patients and/or animal models of CFS are certainly needed. In addition, research on the effects of mucosal barrier dysfunction on enteric nerves and their activity in CFS are clearly warranted.
Komaroff AL, Buchwald D: Symptoms and signs of chronic fatigue syndrome. 1. Rev Infect Dis 1991, 13:S8–11. Komaroff AL, Fagioli LR, Geiger AM, Doolittle TH, Lee J, Kornish RJ, Gleit MA, Guerriero RT, et al.: An examination of the working case definition of chronic fatigue syndrome. Am J Med 1996, 100:56–64.
2. Reyes M, Nisenbaum R, Hoaglin DC, Unger ER, Emmons C, Randall B, Stewart JA, Abbey S, Jones JF, Gantz N, Minden S, Reeves WC: Prevalence and incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome in Wichita, Kansas. Arch Intern Med 2003, 163:1530–1536.
4. Engel MA, Neurath MF: New pathophysiological insights and modern treatment of IBD. J Gastroenterol 2010.
Jason LA, Richman JA, Rademaker AW, Jordan KM, Plioplys AV, Taylor RR, McCready W, Huang CF, Plioplys S: A community-based study of chronic fatigue syndrome. Arch Intern Med 1999, 159:2129–2137.
5. Bombardier C, Buchwald D: Chronic fatigue, chronic fatigue syndrome, and fibromyalgia. Disability and health-care use. Med Care 1995, 34:924–930.
6. Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, Sharpe MC, Dobbins JG, Komaroff A, et al.: The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1994, 121:953–959.
8. Wessely S, Hotopf M, Sharpe M: Chronic fatigue and its syndromes. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. Aaron LA, Burke MM, Buchwald D: Overlapping conditions among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and temporomandibular disorder. Arch Int Med 2000, 160:221–227.
9. Fletcher MA, Zeng XR, Barnes Z, Levis S, Klimas NG: Plasma cytokines in women with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Transl Med 2009, 7:96.
10. White PD, Thomas JM, Amess J, Crawford DH, Grover SA, Kangro HO, Clare AW: Incidence, risk and prognosis of actue and chronic fatigue syndromes and psychiatric disorders after glandular fever. Br J Psychiatry 1998, 173:475–481.
11. Maes M, Mihaylova I, Leunis JC: Increased serum IgA and IgM against LPS of enterobacteria in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS): indication for the involvement of gram-negative enterobacteria in the etiology of CFS and for the presence of an increased gut-intestinal permeability. J Affect Disord 2007, 99:237–240.
12. Lorusso L, Mikhaylova SV, Capelli E, Ferrari D, Ngonga GK, Ricevuti G: Immunological aspects of chronic fatigue syndrome. Autoimmun Rev 2009, 8:287–291.
13. Gaab J, Rohleder N, Heitz V, Engert V, Schad T, Schurmeyer TH, Ehlert U: Stress-induced changes in LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine production in chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychoneuroendocrinology l205(30):188–198.
14. Raber J, Sorg O, Horn TF, Yu N, Koob GF, Campbell IL, Bloom FE: Inflammatory cytokines: putative regulators of neuronal and neuro-endocrine function. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1998, 26:320–326.
15. Scully P, McKernan DP, Groeger D, Shanahan F, Dinan TG, Quigley EM: Plasma cytokine profiles in females with irritable bowel syndrome and extra-intestinal co-morbidity. Am J Gastroenterol 2010.
16. Clarke G, Quigley EM, Cryan JF, Dinan TG, et al.: Irritable bowel syndrome: towards biomarker identification. Trens Mol Med 2009, 15:478–489.
17. Logan A, Rao V, Irani D: Chronic fatigue syndrome: lactic acid bacteria may be of therapeutic value. Med Hypotheses 2003, 60:915–923.
18. Lyte M, Varcoe JJ, Bailey MT: Anxiogenic effect of subclinical bacterial infection in mice in the absence of overt immune activation. Physiol Behav 1998, 65:63–68.
19. Goehler LF, Lyte M, Gaykema RP: Infection-induced viscerosensory signals from the gut enhance anxiety: implications for psychoneuroimmunology. Brain Behav Immun 2007, 21:721–726.
20. Sullivan A, Nord CE, Evengard B: Effect of supplement with lactic-acid producing bacteria on fatigue and physical activity in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Nutr J 2009, 8:4.
22. Sheedy JR, Wettenhall RE, Scanlon D, Gooley PR, Lewis DP, McGregor N, Stapleton DI, Butt HL, DeMeirleir KL: Increased d-lactic acid intestinal bacteria in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. In Vivo 2009, 23:621–628.
Dunlop SP, Jenkins d, Spiller RC: Distinctive clinical, psychological, and histological features of postinfective irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2003, 98:1578–1583.
23. Isgar B, Harman M, Kaye MD, Whorwell PJ: Symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome in ulcerative colitis in remission. Gut 1983, 24:190–192.
24. Fremont M, Metzger K, Rady H, Hulstaert J, De Meirleir K: Detection of herpesviruses and parvovirus B19 in gastric and intestinal mucosa of chronic fatigue syndrome patients. In Vivo 2009, 23:209–213.
25. Chapenko S, Krumina A, Kozireva S, Nora Z, Sultanova A, Viksna L, Murovska M: Activation of human herpesviruses 6 and 7 in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Clin Virol 2006, S47–51.
26. Cameron B, Flamand L, Juwana H, Middeldorp J, Naing Z, Rawlinson W, Ablashi D, Lloyd A: Serological and virological investigation of the role of the herpesviruses EBV, CMV, and HHV-6 in post-infective fatigue syndrome. J Med Virol 2010, 82:1684–1688.
27. Moss-Morris R, Spence M: To «lump» or to «split» the functional somatic syndrome: can infectious and emotional risk factors differentiate between the onset of chronic fatigue syndrome and irritable bowel syndrome? Psychol Med 2006, 68:463–469.
28. Khan AS, Heneine WM, Chapman LE, Gary HE Jr, Woods TC, Folks TM, Schonberger LB: Assessment of a retrovirus sequence and other possible risk factors for the chronic fatigue syndrome in adults. Ann Intern Med 1993, 118:241–245.
29. Lombardi VC, Ruscetti FW, Das Gupta J, Pfost MA, Hagen KS, Peterson DL, Ruscetti SK, Bagni RK, Petrow- Sadowski C, Gold B, Dean M, Silverman RH, Mikovits JA: Detection of an infectious retrovirus, XMRV, in blood cells of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Science 2009, 326:585–589.
30. Erlwein O, Kaye S, McClure MO, Weber J, Wills G, Collier D, Wessely S, Cleare A: Failure to detect the novel retrovirus XMRV in chronic fatigue syndrome. PLOS One 2010, 5:e8519.
31. Groom HC, Boucherit VC, Makinson K, Randal E, Baptista S, Hagan S, Gow JW, Mattes FM, Breuer J, Kerr JR, Stoye JP, Bishop KN: Absence of xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus in UK patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Retrovirology 2010, 7:10.
32. van Kuppeveld FJ, Jong AS, Lanke KH, Verhaegh GW, Melchers WJ, Swanink CM, Bleijenberg G, Netea MG, Galama JM, van der Meer JW: Prevalence of xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome in the Netherlands: retroscpective analysis of samples from an established cohort.
BMJ 2010, 340:c1018.
33. Hong P, Li J, Li Y: Failure to detect Xenotropic murine leukaemia virus-related virus in Chinese patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Virol J 2010, 7:224.
34. Switzer WM, Jia H, Hohn O, Zheng H-Q, Tang S, Shankar A, Bannert N, Simmons G, Hendry RM, Falkenberg
VR, Reeves WC, Heneine W: Absence of evidence of xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus infection in persons with chronic fatigue syndrome and healthy controls in the United States. Retrovirology 2010, 7:57.
35. Zachrisson O, Regland B, Jahreskog M, Kron M, Gottfries CG: A rating scale for fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome (the FibroFatigue scale). J Psychosom Res 2002, 52:501–509.
36. Cani D, Possemiers S, Van De Wiele T, Guiot Y, Everard A, Rottier O, Geurts L, Naslain D, Neyrinck A, Lambert DM, et al.: Changes in gut microbiota control metabolic endotoxemia-induced inflammation in high-fat diet induced obesity and diabetes in mice. Diabetes 2008, 57:1470–1481.
37. Wu GH, Wang H, Zhang YW, Wu ZH, Wu ZG: Glutamine supplemented parenteral nutrition prevents intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. World J Gastroenterol 2004, 10:2592–2594.
38. Jimenez M: Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with probiotics. An etiopathogenic approach at last? Rev Esp Enferm Dig (Madrid) 2009, 101:553–564.
39. Swidsinski A, Ladhoff A, Pernthaler A, et al.: Mucosal flora in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2002, 122:44–54.
40. Bailey MT, Lubach G, Coe CL: Prenatal stress alters bacterial colonization of the gut in infant monkeys. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2004, 38:414–421.
41. Riedel CU, Foata F, Phillippe D, Adolfsson O, Eikmanns BJ, Blum S: Anti-inflammatory effects of bifidobacteria by inhibition of LPS-induced NF-kappaB activation. World J Gastroenterol 2006, 12:3729–3735. Bailey MT, Coe C: Maternal separation disrupts the integrity of the intestinal microflora in infant rhesus monkeys. Dev Psychobiol 1999, 35:146–155.
43. Tannock GW, Savage D: Influences of dietary and environmental stress on microbial populations in the murine gastrointestinal tract. Infect Immun 1974, 9:591–598.
44. Suzuki K, Harasawa R, Yoshitake Y, Mitsuoka T: Effects of crowding and heat stress on intestinal flora, body weight gain, and feed efficiency of growing rats and chicks. Nippon Jujigaku Zasshi 1983, 45:331–338.
45. Butt HL, Dunstan R, McGregor NR, Roberts Tk: Bacterial colonosis in patients with persistent fatigue. In Proceedings of the AHMF international clinical and scientific conference. Sydney, Australia; 2001.
46. Cani D, Possemiers S, Van De Wiele T, Guiot Y, Everard A, Rottier O, Geurts L, Naslain D, Neyrinck A, Lambert DM, Muccioli GG, Delzenne NM: Changes in gut microbiota control inflammation in obese mice through a mechanism involving GLP-2-drive improvement of gut permeability. Gut 2009, 58:1091–1103.
47. Chen C, Brown DR, Xie Y, et al.: Catecholamines modulate Escherichia coli O157:H7 adherence to murine cecal mucosa. Shock 2003, 20:183–188.
48. Zhou Q, Zhang B, Verne GN: Intestinal membrane permeability and hypersensitivity in the irritable bowel syndrome. Pain 2009, 146:41–46.
49. Lee KJ, Tack J: Altered intestinal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome. Neurgastroenterol Motil 2010, 22:493–498.
50. Ohland CL, Wallace KM: Probiotic bacteria and intestinal epithelial barrier function. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2010, 298:G807–G819.
51. Aragon G, Aragon D, Borum M, Doman DB: Probiotic therapy for irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010, 6:39–44.
52. Guyonnet D, Chassany O, Ducrotte P, Picard C, Mouret M, et al.: Effect of a fermented milk containing Bifidobacterium animalis DN-173 010 on the health-related quality of life and symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome in adults in primary care: a mulicentre, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007, 26:475–486.
53. Rao AV, Bested AC, Beaulne TM, Katzman MA, Iorio C, Berardi JM, Logan AC: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of a probiotic in emotional symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome. Gut Pathogens 2009, 6.
54. Phillips J: The treatment of melancholia by the lactic acid 55. bacillus. J Mental Sci 1910, 56:422–431.
Raison CL, Lin JM, Reeves WC: Association of peripheral inflammatory markers with chronic fatigue in a population-based sample. Brain Behav Immun 2009, 23:327–337.
56. Dantzer R, O’Connor JC, Freund GG, Johnson RW, Kelley KW: From inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system subjugates the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008, 9:46–56.
57. Capuron L, Gumnick JF, Musselman DL, Lawson DH, Reemsnyder A, Nemeroff CB, Miller AH: Neurobehavioral effects of interferon-alpha in cancer patients: phenomenology and paroxetine responsiveness of symptom dimensions. Neuropscyhopharmacology 2002, 26:643–652.
58. Lyall M, Peakman M, Wessely S: A systematic review and critical evaluation of the immunology of chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res 2003, 55:79–90.
59. Klimas NG, Koneru AO: Chronic fatigue syndrome: inflammation, immune function and neuroendocrine interactions. Curr Rheum Rep 2007, 9:482–487.
60. Natelson BH, Haghighi MH, Ponzio NM: Evidence for the presence of immune dysfunction in chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2002, 9:747–752.
61. van Langenberg DR, Gibson PR: Systematic review: fatigue in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010, 32:131–143.
62. Lamprecht K: Pilot study of etanercept treatment in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. In Meeting of the Amercian Associations of Chronic Fagitue Syndrome (AACFS). Seattle; 2001.
63. Powell R, Ren J, Lewith G, et al.: Identification of novel expressed sequences, upregulated in the leucocytes of chronic fatigue syndrome patients. Clin Exp Allergy 2003, 33:1450–1456.
64. Kerr JR, Christian P, Hodgetts A, Langford PR, Devanur LD, Petty R, Burke B, Sinclair LI, Richards SCM, Montgomery J, McDermott CR, Harrison TJ, Kellan P, Nutt DJ, Holgate ST, the Collaborative Clinical Study Group: Current research priorities in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: disease mechanisms, a diagnostic test and specific treatments. J Clin Pathol 2007, 60:113–116. Broderick G, Fuite J, Kreitz A, Vernon SD, Klimas N, Fletcher MA: A formal analysis of cytokine networks in chronic fatigue syndrome. Brain Behav Immun 2010.
66. Furness JB: The enteric nervous system: normal functions and enteric neuropathies. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2008, 20(1):32–38.
67. Geboes K, Collins S: Structural abnormalities of the nervous system in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 1998, 10:189–202.
68. Villanacci V, Bassotti G, Nascimbeni R, Antonelli E, Cadei M, Fisogni S, Salerni B, Geboes K: Enteric nervous system abnormalities in inflammatory bowel disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2008, 20:1009–1016.
69. Dvorak AM, Onderdonk AB, McLeod RS, Monahan-Earley RA, Cullen J, Antonioli DA, Blair JE, Morgan ES, Cisneros RL, Estrella P, et al.: Axonal necrosis of enteric autonomic nerves in continent ileal pouches. Possible implications for pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease. Ann Surg 1993, 217:260–271.
70. Tornblom H, Lindberg G, Nyberg B, Veress B, et al.: Full-thickness biopsy of jejunum reveals inflammation and enteric neuropathy in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 2002, 123:1972–1979.
71. De Giorgio R, Camilleri M: Human enteric neuropathies: morphology and molecular pathology. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2004, 16:515–531.
72. Lakhan SE, Kirchgessner A: Neuroinflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. 73. J Neuroinflam 2010, 7:37. Sido B, Hack V, Hochlehnert A, Lipps H, Herfarth C, Droge W: Impairment of intestinal glutathione synthesis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 1998, 42:485–492.
74. Maes M, Mihaylova I, Kubera M, Uytterhoeven M, Vrydags N, Bosmans E: Increased 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, a marker of oxidative damage to DNA, in major depression and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2009, 30:715–722.
75. Maes M, Twisk FNM: Chronic fatigue syndrome: Harvey and Wessely’s (bio)psychosocial model versus a bio(psychosocial) model based on inflammatory and oxidative and nitrosative stress pathways. BMC Medicine 2010, 8:35.
76. Wagner F, Asfar P, Calzia E, Radermache P, Szabo C: Bench-to-bedside review: hydrogen sulfide – the third gaseous transmitter: applications for critical care. Critical Care 2009, 13:213.
77. Reiffenstein RJ, Hulbert WC, Roth SH: Toxicology of hydrogen sulfide. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1992, 32:109–134.
78. Lowicka E, Beltowski J: Hydrogen sulfide (H2S)- the third gas of interest for pharmacologists. Pharmacol Reports 2007, 59:4–24.
79. Fiorucci S, Distrutti E, Cirinio G, Wallace JL: The emerging roles of hydrogen sulfide in the gastrointestinal tract and liver. Gastroenterology 2006, 131:259–271.
80. Ishii I, De Giorgio R, Campi B, Schemann M: Hydrogen sulfide is a novel prosecretory neuromodulator in the guinea-pig and human colon. Gastroenterology 2006, 131:1542–1552.
81. Myhill S, Booth NE, McLaren-Howard J: Chronic fatigue syndrome and mitochondrial dysfunction. Int J Clin Med 2009, 2:1–16.
82. Sheedy JR, Wettenhall R, Scanlon D, Gooley PR, Lewis DP, McGregor N, Stapleton DI, Butt HL, de Meirleir KL: Increased d-lactic acid intestinal bacteria in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. In Vivo 2009, 23:621–628.
83. Jammes Y, Steinberg JG, Mambrini O, Bregeon F, Delliaux S: Chronic fatigue syndrome: assessment of increased oxidative stress and altered muscle excitability in response to incremental exercise. J Intern Med 2005, 299–310.
84. Maes M, Mihaylova I, Kubera M, Uytterhoeven M, Vrydags N, Bosmans E: Coenzyme Q10 deficiency in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is related to fatigue, autonomic and neurocognitive symptoms and is another risk fact explaining the early mortality in ME/CFS due to cardiovascular disorder. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2009, 30:470–476.
85. Maes M, Mihaylova I, Kubera M, Uytterhoeven M, Vrydags N, Bosmans E: Lower plasma coenzyme Q10 in depression: a marker for treatment resistance and chronic fatigue in depression and a risk factor to cardiovascular disorder in that illness. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2009, 30:462–469.
87. Liu C, Russell RM, Smith DE, Bronson RT, Milibury PE, Furukawa S, Wang😄, Blumberg JB: The effect of dietary glutathione and coenzyme Q10 on the prevention and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in mice. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 2004, 74:74–85.
CDC: Centers for Disease Control; CFS: chronic fatigue syndrome; CoQ10: coenzyme Q10; CRH: corticotrophin-release hormone; COX-2: cyclooxygenase-2; ENS: enteric nervous system; EBV: Epstien-Barr virus; GI: gastrointestinal; GSH: glutathione hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal; HPA: human parvovirus B19; HPV: human herpes virus-6; HHV-6: human T-lymphotropic virus type 2; HTLV-2: hydrogen sulfide; H2S: inducible nitric oxide synthase; iNOS: inflammatory bowel disease; IBD: irritable bowel syndrome; IBS: interleukin-6; IL-6: interleukin 8; IL-8: interleukin1-beta; IL1-β: interferon-gamma; IFN-γ: interferon-beta; IFN-β: lipopolysaccarhide; LPS: natural killer; NK: nuclear factor-kappa B; NF-κB: peripheral blood mononuclear cell; PBMC: reactive oxygen species; ROS: tissue transglutaminase; tTG: tumor necrosis factor alpha; TNF-α: xenotropic MLV-related virus; XMRV: 8-OH-deoxy guanosine, 8-OHdG.
Filed under: KDM, Konferanser, M.E., M.E. i media, M.E. på Youtube, M.E.-lenker, Om undersøkelsene og behandlingen
Professor dr. med. Kenny De Meirleir er no med i ei veldig viktig
ME-forskningsgruppe i USA, invitert av to andre
som også er solide «hjørnesteinar» i ME-forskning gjennom mange år: Dr. Derek Enlander og Dr. David Bell.
Konferanse på Dr. Enlanders nye ME-senter 20.11.11
12 grunnregler ved ME – skrevet av overlege Sidsel Kreyberg
1. Unngå støy og unødvendig snakk. Spørsmål kan være en stor belastning. Det enkleste for den syke er rene ja-/nei-spørsmål. La være å stille nye spørsmål hvis du ikke får svar. Avvent situasjonen til den syke selv tar initiativet til å snakke. Tinninglappene (som bearbeider hørselsinntrykk) kan være ute av funksjon. Å bli tiltalt kan da oppleves som å bli slått i hodet med noe hardt. Tinninglappene bearbeider også tall, korttidshukommelse, musikk med mer.
2. Ingen forkjølede eller smittebærende personer må være i kontakt med ME-pasienter. Bruk munnbind hvis du hoster eller nettopp har vært forkjølet og absolutt må være i samme rom. Vær alltid nøye med håndhygienen. ME-pasienter har ikke normalt infeksjonsforsvar. Selv en tilsynelatende banal infeksjon kan utløse alvorlig og langvarig forverrelse.
3. Sørg for jevn temperatur. Unngå enhver form for avkjøling. Kulde gir ubehag og nedsetter funksjonsnivået. Mange er også følsomme for overoppheting. Unngå trykk mot magen fra dyner og tepper når den syke er sengeliggende. Solar plexus kan være svært ømfintlig.
4. Toalettbesøk er ofte en stor påkjenning og kan kreve lang restitusjonstid (kan oppleves som slag mot solar plexus). Matinntak gir også forbigående generelt nedsatt funksjon. Unngå all aktivitet i rommet og unngå å snakke eller engasjere den syke i noe under og etter måltider.
5. Nye ansikter, nyheter (gode eller dårlige), overraskelser, forflytninger og omstillinger av alle slag er unormalt krevende for en ME-pasient. Alt som er nytt eller uventet kan medføre akutt og langvarig energitap – også plutselige lyder, tilsnakk og bevegelser i synsfeltet. Den syke må derfor ha forutsigbarhet i det daglige og må få nødvendig forberedelsestid hvis noe går utenom planen. De fleste er også ømfintlige for skarpt eller elektrisk lys, maskinlyder og væromslag. De mest utsatte har absolutt intoleranse for lyd, lys og berøring og må skjermes maksimalt.
6. Ingen med sterkt parfymerte kosmetiske produkter må være i kontakt med ME-pasienter. Luktinntrykk kan utløse akutt og langvarig symptomøkning. Sørg for god utluftning.
7. Det må ikke gå mer enn fire timer mellom hvert måltid. Sult ledsages av symptomøkning, stivhet og svelgebesvær. Den syke kan også få en raskt innsettende metthetsfølelse når maten endelig kommer. Maten må være så variert som mulig uten å provosere symptomer. Matintoleranse opptrer ofte ved ME og kan variere betydelig i sykdommens løp.
8. Mange tørster. Vann må alltid være tilgjengelig. Ikke alle kan drikke ved egen hjelp.
9. Berøring, brå bevegelser, bruk av muskelkraft eller trykk mot et underlag kan gi store smerter og utløse langvarig nedsatt funksjon i den aktuelle kroppsdelen. Reaksjonen kan komme forsinket. Anstrengt stemmebruk kan likeledes gi smerter og langvarig heshet.
10. Det å snakke er tungt og kan gi forsinket symptomøkning, eventuelt utslett. Ta nødvendige pauser. Den syke blir også unormalt sliten av å måtte forklare eller gjenta noe. Dette forsterkes merkbart når den syke møtes med motforestillinger, avbrytelser, spørsmål, mistenksomhet, bagatellisering og uoppmerksomhet. Spiss ørene, ta eventuelt notater og vær den sykes talerør.
11. Alle former for aktivitet, fysisk så vel som mental, aktiv så vel som passiv, kan utløse økning i symptomene. Økning i symptomene kan enten komme umiddelbart eller forsinket med timer og dager, i et varierende mønster i sykdommens løp. Dette reaksjonsmønsteret er sykdommens mest karakteristiske kjennetegn. Det er også den viktigste rettesnoren i behandlingen. Problemet løses ikke ved å holde seg i aktivitet eller øke aktivitetsnivået, men ved konsekvent å unngå all aktivitet og alle stimuli som gir symptomøkning. Dette er vanskelig å styre både fordi reaksjonen kan komme forsinket og fordi aktivitet kan gi forbigående økt velvære. Aktivitetsnivået øker spontant når den syke kommer i bedring, og må da kontrolleres nøye. Aktiviteter som går mot tyngdekraften, som å reise seg opp, løfte armene, holde bestikk, pusse tenner eller vaske hår, er spesielt vanskelige ved ME. Det kan være tyngre å sitte enn å stå, å stå enn å gå, å gå enn å løpe osv (statisk aktivitet tyngre enn dynamisk). Den syke må ofte mobilisere krefter for å få unna helt nødvendige gjøremål som å spise, og må da få anledning til å bli fortest mulig ferdig og gå tilbake til «hvilestilling». Det er likeledes meget utfordrende å vente fordi det innebærer en mental mobilisering. Dette kan misoppfattes som mangel på sosial kompetanse. ME kan stabiliseres og gradvis bedres når aktivitetsnivået konsekvent begrenses til dét den syke kan tåle. Bedringsprosessen er langsom og krever stor tålmodighet.
12. Alle som har ME har et stort arbeid med å mestre symptomene, budsjettere med kreftene og restituere seg etter aktivitet og stimulering. Den syke «hviler» altså svært lite i vanlig forstand. En som har ME må derfor aldri engasjeres i noe mot sin vilje eller fratas kontrollen med bremsene. All hjelp må bygge på opparbeidet egenmestring. Omsorgspersoner må sette seg inn i den sykes avmakt og spesielle behov. Det er et klart medisinsk ansvar å sørge for aktiv skjerming og avlastning til sykdomsfølelsen og mønsteret med symptomøkning er helt borte.
Filed under: Diverse, KDM, KDM i Norge, M.E., M.E. i media, M.E.-behandling i Belgia, M.E.-lenker
Veldig bra tiltak denne underskriftskampanja!!!
Eg synst det må vere tydelig for ein kvar at:
ME-pasientar er i allefall IKKJE hypokonderar,
for vi vil ikkje berre bli utreda: vi vil bli FRISKE, så friske at vi kan jobbe, vere sosiale, samfunnsnyttige og gjere alt vi drøyme om å gjere🙂
Ja,vi VIL SÅ GJERNE bli friske at vi betaler rekninga sjølv, sjølv om vi ikkje har økonomi til det!!
-og det seier vel meir enn ord..
Eg synst det er kjempesterkt og fint å sjå Anette Gilje i filmen «Få meg frisk» når ho smiler sitt vakraste smil og ikkje klarer å stoppe å smile når prof.De Meirleir fortel ho at han har funne alvorlige infeksjonar etc ! Då blir håpet tent om å kunne bli frisk!
Den samme reaksjonen hadde eg også då eg fekk prøveresultatet av The Professor.
Denne reaksjonen har eg sett på veldig mange ME-pasientar no, og det er like sterkt kvar gong
VI VIL BLI FRISKE altså!!!!
-hvis noken var i tvil om DET
Vi gir oss ikkje!!!